Standstill Agreement Borrower

In short, a status quo agreement is a contract between creditors and a debtor company in which participating creditors agree not to take steps to recover or enforce their debts during a period when information can be collected and a strategy can be formulated to enable the company to survive its economic pressures. The goal is often to restructure in one way or another. Commercial creditors are generally not included, as the company normally has to pay these creditors to ensure that its day-to-day operations are maintained. From the point of view of the former lender, the previous lender, if it is late, wants to have control and not that the subordinated lender or anyone else, including the issue, dictate the enforcement actions taken. The former lender therefore requires a status quo agreement from the subordinate lender. Contracting parties may enter into leniency agreements providing for a moratorium on payments to creditors. A status quo agreement between a lender and a borrower may also exist when the lender stops requiring a planned interest or capital payment for a loan to give the borrower time to restructure its debts. Status quo agreements could also take other steps to protect the company. You can set a deadline. B during which the bidder cannot attempt to obtain the acquisition.

When an agreed status quo period expires, but the creditor is satisfied that the company has made good efforts to address its liquidity problems and that the creditor`s debts are reasonably expected to be met soon, it is not uncommon for a status quo agreement to be shaken up and for a new period of leniency to be agreed upon, perhaps with heavier terms; For example, creditors may insist that there be more transparency and/or an agreement so that there is no debt challenge in a liquidation procedure when necessary. Status quo agreements exist not only between the two lenders, but may also exist between lenders and loans. They can ensure that the borrower has a period of time during which no payment is required for them to restructure their debts. A status quo agreement can be reached between a lender and a borrower. It gives the borrower time to restructure its debts. On the other hand, the lender provides for a certain moratorium on the payment of interest or principal loans. In other areas of activity, a status quo agreement can be virtually any agreement between the parties, in which both parties agree to discontinue the case for a specified period of time. This may include an agreement to defer payments to help a company in difficult market conditions, agreements to stop the production of a product, agreements between governments or many other types of agreements.

The main provisions of this type of agreement are that status quo agreements can be very useful in the early stages of a company`s financial difficulties if a creditor might be tempted to rely on the terms of its financing agreement to threaten and be paid to expedite its loans before the company default is triggered as part of its agreements with other creditors. These agreements are also useful because the company`s situation continues to deteriorate and both the company and its creditors face a difficult choice between insolvency proceedings and restructuring. At the international level, it may be an agreement between countries to maintain the current situation, in which a responsibility owed to one to the other is suspended for a specified period of time. In the development of real estate, it is sometimes necessary for a borrower to receive money from more than one lender. In this case, it is likely that a priority structure will be created among the lenders participating in the transaction.

Comments are closed.